ICT Director ANZSCO 135111 | Skills Assessment & Migration

ICT Director ANZSCO 135111 is classified under Australia’s Chief Information Officer occupation group, covering senior ICT roles such as CIO, CTO, ICT Director, and CISO.

The assessing authority is the Australian Computer Society (ACS), which evaluates qualifications and executive ICT experience.

This occupation is listed on the STSOL, which excludes the Subclass 189 visa and requires employer or state-nominated pathways.

Role of an ICT Director

ICT Directors lead enterprise technology strategy and digital transformation.

Key duties:

  • ICT strategy development
  • IT systems and infrastructure management
  • Cybersecurity and risk oversight
  • Leading ICT teams and budgets
  • Driving digital transformation

ACS Skills Assessment

ACS assesses:

  • Qualifications
  • ICT leadership experience
  • Executive-level responsibilities
  • Supporting employment evidence

A positive ACS assessment is required for migration.

RPL Pathway

The ACS RPL pathway is for professionals without a closely related ICT degree. It requires a competency report with real project evidence and leadership experience.

Visa Options (2026)

Because it is on STSOL, options include:

  • Subclass 190 (State nomination)
  • Subclass 491 (Regional visa)
  • Subclass 482 (Employer sponsored)
  • Subclass 186 (PR via employer)
  • Subclass 494 (Regional sponsorship)

Subclass 189 is not available.

Occupation Status

ICT Director ANZSCO 135111 is an STSOL occupation, meaning migration depends on sponsorship or nomination rather than independent PR.

Conclusion

The ICT Director ANZSCO 135111 is a senior-level migration pathway requiring strong executive ICT experience and careful planning due to STSOL restrictions. ACS assessment, especially through RPL, is essential for eligibility. 

To learn more: https://cdraustraliaengineer.com/anzsco-code/acs-rpl/ict-director-anzsco-135111/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TRA Processing Time & Success Rate Guide

Image
TRA processing time in 2026 varies significantly depending on the assessment pathway. While official timelines provide a baseline, actual processing durations are often longer due to document checks, employer verification, and application completeness. TRA Processing Time by Pathway (2026) MSA (Migration Skills Assessment) Official timeframe: Up to 120 days Real-world timeframe: 6–9 months Key factor: Document verification and employer reference checks JRP (Job Ready Program) Total duration: 18–24 months Includes: Multiple stages of workplace and competency assessment Nature: Long-term structured pathway OSAP (Offshore Skills Assessment Program) Typical timeframe: Around 15 weeks (from RTO submission) Important update: OSAP registrations are paused from 14 March 2026 Key Fact About TRA Processing TRA does not offer priority, fast-track, or expedited processing All applications are processed in queue order No paid service exists for faster ou...
Read more

VETASSESS Skill Assessment Rejection—What It Means & How to Appeal

Image
 A VETASSESS skills assessment rejection can feel like a major setback—particularly when you’ve invested time and effort into preparing your documents. Good news: you do have options. This guide explains the top reasons for rejection , how to file an appeal , and what to do if you plan to reapply. What You’ll Find in This Post: Key causes behind negative assessments Step-by-step appeal procedure Tips for preparing a stronger resubmission Read the full guide and empower your reapplication strategy: https://cdraustraliaengineer.com/blog/vetassess-skill-assessment-rejection/
Read more

Engineers Australia vs ACS RPL: Best migration path (2026)

Image
Confused between Engineers Australia vs ACS RPL? Learn key differences, eligibility, documents & which pathway is right for your Australian migration in 2026.   Engineers Australia vs ACS RPL  are two different skills assessment pathways for Australian migration. Engineers Australia (EA)  is for engineering professionals like civil, mechanical, electrical, and structural engineers. It assesses engineering competency through CDR and project-based evidence. ACS RPL  is for IT and ICT professionals without formal ICT degrees. It evaluates skills based on work experience in software, networking, cybersecurity, and related fields. Key Difference: EA = Engineering careers ACS RPL = IT & ICT careers Choosing the correct pathway improves approval chances and avoids delays in your Australia PR process. To learn more: https://cdraustraliaengineer.com/blog/engineers-australia-vs-acs-rpl/
Read more